Coinbase’s Chief Authorized Officer, Paul Grewal, has taken a step in the direction of resolving the continuing regulatory ambiguity surrounding digital belongings. On October 13, 2023, Grewal filed a proper response with the U.S. Courtroom of Appeals for the Third Circuit, urging the courtroom to challenge a mandamus order. This authorized transfer seeks to compel the Securities and Trade Fee (SEC) to behave on Coinbase’s rulemaking petition inside a span of 30 days. The transfer underscores the rising impatience and concern inside Coinbase and the broader digital asset neighborhood in the direction of the SEC’s perceived bureaucratic dalliance in clarifying the applying of securities legal guidelines to digital belongings.
Since July 2022, when Coinbase initiated its petition for rulemaking, there was a conspicuous absence of motion from the SEC in offering clear directives on how securities legal guidelines apply to digital belongings. Regardless of going through an enforcement motion beneath these identical legal guidelines, the SEC has not proven a willingness to expedite the clarification course of. The regulatory physique’s current replace on October 11, 2023, merely shared a staff-level suggestion to the Fee concerning Coinbase’s petition and not using a formal dedication to motion.
Paul Grewal and Coinbase have criticized the SEC’s lack of transparency and evasiveness, terming it a “bureaucratic pantomime.” The digital asset trade stays entrapped in a regulatory Catch-22 owing to the SEC’s demand for registration from digital asset companies with out availing clear pointers on the registration course of. Moreover, the contradictory statements emanating from the SEC alongside its aggressive enforcement actions additional convolute the regulatory panorama.
Latest developments have solely served to underline the SEC’s obvious resistance in the direction of initiating new rulemaking. The SEC Chair reemphasized the sufficiency of current legal guidelines and guidelines for digital belongings, whereas a noticeable surge in enforcement actions in opposition to digital asset companies, together with novel actions in opposition to non-fungible token (NFT) issuers, has been noticed. These actions presuppose the adequacy of current guidelines, a notion that stands at odds with the premise of Coinbase’s petition for brand spanking new rulemaking.
With the regulatory ambiguity persevering with to solid an extended shadow over the digital asset trade, Grewal argues {that a} mandamus order is warranted to carry the SEC accountable and to propel it into motion. He emphasizes that clear pointers are quintessential to making sure authorized compliance, nurturing trade development, and eradicating the continuing Catch-22 state of affairs that the trade finds itself ensnared in. The decision for a mandamus order is seen as a vital judicial intervention to finish the SEC’s extended inaction, and to foster a conducive regulatory setting for digital asset companies.
Picture supply: Shutterstock
