Wednesday, February 4, 2026
No Result
View All Result
The Crypto HODL
  • Home
  • Bitcoin
  • Crypto Updates
    • Altcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Crypto Updates
    • Crypto Mining
    • Crypto Exchanges
  • Blockchain
  • NFT
  • DeFi
  • Web3
  • Metaverse
  • Regulations
  • Scam Alert
  • Analysis
  • Videos
Marketcap
  • Home
  • Bitcoin
  • Crypto Updates
    • Altcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Crypto Updates
    • Crypto Mining
    • Crypto Exchanges
  • Blockchain
  • NFT
  • DeFi
  • Web3
  • Metaverse
  • Regulations
  • Scam Alert
  • Analysis
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result
The Crypto HODL
No Result
View All Result

Universal-2 Outperforms Whisper in Speech-to-Text Model Comparison

November 7, 2024
in Blockchain
Reading Time: 2 mins read
0 0
A A
0
Home Blockchain
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter




Zach Anderson
Nov 07, 2024 15:59

An in depth comparability of Common-2 and OpenAI’s Whisper fashions reveals Common-2’s superior efficiency in accuracy, correct noun detection, and lowered hallucination charges.





In a complete evaluation of main Speech-to-Textual content fashions, AssemblyAI’s Common-2 has emerged as a high performer when in comparison with OpenAI’s Whisper variants, in accordance with a latest report by AssemblyAI. The analysis centered on real-world use circumstances, assessing fashions on duties important for creating correct transcripts, akin to correct noun recognition, alphanumeric transcription, and textual content formatting.

Mannequin Comparability

The evaluation in contrast Common-2 and its predecessor Common-1 with OpenAI’s Whisper large-v3 and Whisper turbo fashions. Every mannequin was evaluated primarily based on parameters like Phrase Error Charge (WER), Correct Noun Error Charge (PNER), and different metrics vital for Speech-to-Textual content duties.

Efficiency Metrics

Common-2 achieved the bottom Phrase Error Charge (WER) at 6.68%, marking a 3% enchancment over Common-1. Whisper fashions, whereas aggressive, had barely greater error charges, with large-v3 recording a WER of seven.88% and turbo at 7.75%.

In correct noun recognition, Common-2 demonstrated superior accuracy with a 13.87% PNER, outperforming each Whisper large-v3 and turbo. This mannequin additionally excelled in textual content formatting, reaching a U-WER of 10.04%, which signifies higher dealing with of punctuation and capitalization.

Alphanumeric and Hallucination Charges

Whisper large-v3 confirmed power in alphanumeric transcription with the bottom error charge of three.84%, barely forward of Common-2’s 4.00%. Nonetheless, Common-2’s lowered hallucination charges had been a major benefit, with a 30% discount in comparison with Whisper fashions, making it extra dependable for real-world purposes.

Conclusion

Common-2’s developments over Common-1 are evident, with enhancements in accuracy, correct noun dealing with, and formatting. Regardless of Whisper’s strengths in sure areas, its susceptibility to hallucinations poses challenges for constant efficiency.

For additional insights and detailed metrics, the total analysis is accessible by AssemblyAI’s official report.

Picture supply: Shutterstock



Source link

Tags: ComparisonModeloutperformsspeechtotextUniversal2Whisper
Previous Post

Staking could lower fees and boost interest in Ethereum ETFs, analyst claims

Next Post

France reviews Polymarket: changes ahead

Related Posts

OP Price Prediction: Targets $0.35-$0.42 by March 2026 Despite Current Oversold Conditions
Blockchain

OP Price Prediction: Targets $0.35-$0.42 by March 2026 Despite Current Oversold Conditions

February 4, 2026
Tether Posts $10B Profit in 2025, Treasury Holdings Hit $141B
Blockchain

Tether Posts $10B Profit in 2025, Treasury Holdings Hit $141B

February 4, 2026
The Graph Backs x402 and ERC-8004 Standards for AI Agent Economy
Blockchain

The Graph Backs x402 and ERC-8004 Standards for AI Agent Economy

February 3, 2026
OnchainDB Builds Pay-Per-Query Database on Celestia’s 1Tb/s Infrastructure
Blockchain

OnchainDB Builds Pay-Per-Query Database on Celestia’s 1Tb/s Infrastructure

February 3, 2026
SHIB Price Prediction: Targets $0.0000085 by Month-End Amid Mixed Technical Signals
Blockchain

SHIB Price Prediction: Targets $0.0000085 by Month-End Amid Mixed Technical Signals

February 3, 2026
Binance Dual Investment Challenge Offers 8,888 USDC in February Rewards
Blockchain

Binance Dual Investment Challenge Offers 8,888 USDC in February Rewards

February 3, 2026
Next Post
France reviews Polymarket: changes ahead

France reviews Polymarket: changes ahead

Rekt Brands Secures $1.5M Funding, Led by Community and Angels

Rekt Brands Secures $1.5M Funding, Led by Community and Angels

Mistral AI Unveils New Moderation API to Enhance Content Safety

Mistral AI Unveils New Moderation API to Enhance Content Safety

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Twitter Instagram LinkedIn Telegram RSS
The Crypto HODL

Find the latest Bitcoin, Ethereum, blockchain, crypto, Business, Fintech News, interviews, and price analysis at The Crypto HODL

CATEGORIES

  • Altcoin
  • Analysis
  • Bitcoin
  • Blockchain
  • Crypto Exchanges
  • Crypto Mining
  • Crypto Updates
  • DeFi
  • Ethereum
  • Metaverse
  • NFT
  • Regulations
  • Scam Alert
  • Uncategorized
  • Videos
  • Web3

SITE MAP

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Contact us

Copyright © 2023 The Crypto HODL.
The Crypto HODL is not responsible for the content of external sites.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Bitcoin
  • Crypto Updates
    • Altcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Crypto Updates
    • Crypto Mining
    • Crypto Exchanges
  • Blockchain
  • NFT
  • DeFi
  • Web3
  • Metaverse
  • Regulations
  • Scam Alert
  • Analysis
  • Videos
Crypto Marketcap

Copyright © 2023 The Crypto HODL.
The Crypto HODL is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In