China Presses Brokers to Halt Real-World Asset Tokenization in Hong Kong: Report

China’s securities regulator has reportedly instructed some brokerages to pause their real-world asset tokenization enterprise in Hong Kong, aligning with Beijing’s cautious stance as Hong Kong pushes ahead with digital-asset initiatives.

The China Securities Regulatory Fee (CSRC) has given casual steerage to no less than two main brokerages, asking them to chorus from offshore RWA actions, in line with an preliminary report from Reuters on Monday that cited two people acquainted  with the matter.

A number of Chinese language companies, together with brokerage subsidiaries, have launched or introduced tokenized merchandise within the metropolis, per the report.

What’s RWA tokenization?

RWA (real-world asset) tokenization is a course of that converts regulated belongings equivalent to bonds, equities, actual property, or funds into blockchain-based tokens.

The CSRC’s transfer seems to be motivated by risk-management issues, with officers reportedly wanting “robust, respectable companies.”

The prospects and alternatives within the RWA sector have gained traction in Hong Kong over the previous yr, following the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Fee’s (SFC) unveiling of a complete roadmap geared toward shaping town into a worldwide hub for digital belongings.

In August, the SFC launched a brand new stablecoin licensing regime to assist push these efforts additional, with some 77 companies displaying curiosity by means of functions.

A month prior, Shanghai’s state asset regulator held a closed-door assembly to review stablecoins and blockchain infrastructure, signaling that China is pursuing what observers have referred to as a “tiered experimentation” slightly than outright liberalization.

Nonetheless, Beijing has stored tight restrictions since banning crypto buying and selling and mining in 2021.



A “measured method”

Observers, nevertheless, see it as a cautious gesture.

“It suggests regulators are taking a measured method to how tokenized belongings work together with capital markets, particularly throughout borders,” Jakob Kronbichler, CEO and co-founder of on-chain credit score market Clearpool, advised Decrypt.

Actual-world finance is “already transferring on-chain, whether or not by means of credit score for funds, buying and selling companies, or different institutional use circumstances,” Kronbichler mentioned, including that Hong Kong’s licensing framework creates the atmosphere for gamers to develop “even when the broader regional stance takes time to align.”

“China’s casual steerage seems to replicate warning slightly than opposition to tokenisation,” Giorgia Pellizzari, head of custody at digital asset monetary establishment Hex Belief, advised Decrypt, including that regulators “appear to be watching intently how these merchandise hyperlink into capital markets, particularly throughout borders.”

For companies within the sector, “the important thing dangers are delays in product launches and elevated compliance complexity,” Pellizzari famous. “Long term, this might reinforce the significance of clear, coordinated guidelines between jurisdictions.”

In June, GF Securities’ Hong Kong arm rolled out “GF tokens,” yield merchandise tied to main currencies. China Service provider Financial institution Worldwide helped Shenzhen Futian Funding concern a 500 million yuan ($70.2 million) digital bond. Seazen Group additionally launched a Hong Kong institute targeted on tokenization.

Decrypt has reached out to GF Securities, CMB Worldwide, and Seazen Group for remark and can replace this story ought to they reply.

Whether or not these efforts will proceed with out disruption is unclear.

The uncertainty for companies “working between Hong Kong and the mainland” is a niche that “may gradual cross-border capital flows within the quick time period,” Kronbichler famous.

Regardless of this, “the underlying demand for tokenized credit score and fee financing hasn’t modified, he mentioned. “This pause is extra about calibrating coverage than shifting path, and Hong Kong nonetheless presents a transparent framework for establishments to maintain constructing.”