Cardano has simply come via one of the extreme technical incidents in its historical past – a 14-hour chain break up that founder Charles Hoskinson insists was “severe, however not existential.” In a late-November livestream, he walked viewers via Pi Lanningham’s “Poison Piggy – After Motion Report,” an in depth autopsy on what occurred on November 21, 2025, and what it means for Cardano’s long-held “no downtime” narrative.
Inside Cardano’s 14-Hour Pig-Chain Meltdown
In line with Lanningham, a serialization bug in Cardano’s node implementation created the circumstances for a unidirectional tender fork. The problem first surfaced on November 20 on the preview testnet, when a malformed delegation certificates was accepted by some nodes and rejected by others. Older nodes appropriately rejected the over-long hash; newer nodes, because of a November 2024 code change, truncated it and handled it as legitimate. That model skew created two incompatible views of the chain.
“The entire motive the testnet exists is to be a protected house” to seek out these failures, Hoskinson famous. Below regular circumstances, the bug would have been patched and quietly rolled out. As an alternative, after the repair was recognized and was within the strategy of being communicated to stake pool operators, a near-identical malformed delegation was submitted to mainnet, this time delegating to RATSRATS – conceptually doubling the ticker of RATS, Hoskinson’s personal stake pool.
That transaction break up Cardano mainnet into two forks. The stricter fork, working older code that rejected the malformed hash, turned the “rooster chain.” The permissive fork that accepted it was christened the “pig chain” or “poison piggy.” From that time, the community entered a race: would the poisoned transaction on the pig chain turn out to be immutable earlier than the rooster chain might overtake it?
On affect, Lanningham’s numbers are blunt. Cardano remained reside however degraded. Transaction inclusion by way of strong infrastructure slowed dramatically, with delays of as much as roughly 400 seconds and block occasions on the now-dominant chain stretching to round 16 minutes at their worst. Over the incident window, 846 blocks had been produced on the pig chain and round 13,900 on the rooster chain. Out of 14,383 noticed transactions, 479 – roughly 3.3 % – had been included solely on the discarded pig chain and by no means appeared on the ultimate canonical historical past. Most of these, when resubmitted, turned out to be invalid because of expired validity intervals or conflicting inputs.
“This constitutes a severe degradation of service for customers, however inside anticipated bounds for a high-nines availability of service,” Lanningham wrote. His bottom-line guidelines is terse: “Did the chain proceed to make progress? Sure. Was service degraded? Sure. Have been funds in danger? Probably. Did the Cardano community recuperate underneath basically worst case circumstances? Sure. Would I’ve confidence to construct my enterprise on high of infrastructure that exhibited this stage of robustness? Sure.”
The restoration itself is being held up by Hoskinson as proof of each decentralization and design. A patched node was already obtainable due to the testnet incident; in a single day, IOG, the Cardano Basis, Emurgo, Intersect, exchanges and plenty of SPOs coordinated by way of war-room calls and chat channels to improve to the fastened model and to comply with the extra restrictive rooster chain. There was no protocol-level rollback and no centralized “restart.” As stake migrated, block manufacturing on the pig chain slowed, the rooster chain accelerated, and Ouroboros’ probabilistic finality properties ensured that after the wholesome fork overtook the poisoned one, nodes on the pig chain mechanically switched to the longer, denser chain.
“That is the concrete proof of when the Nakamoto consensus labored as supposed and converged the community to a single canonical historical past,” Lanningham argued. Hoskinson went additional, saying, “This might have killed different chains,” however right here “time works in another way in a distributed system” and successfully stretched the rollback window in Cardano’s favor.
Classes Discovered
Each, nonetheless, are clear concerning the draw back. “The actual fact the bug appeared in any respect is a failure of our testing rigor,” Lanningham conceded. The reliance of virtually all explorers on cardano-db-sync left the ecosystem “flying blind” when that part crashed on the malformed transaction. Many SPOs doubtless upgraded “blind,” trusting suggestions from founding entities somewhat than reasoning independently about fork selection. And sure off-chain programs – particularly exchanges and bridges – had been uncovered to replay and double-spend danger, even when early proof suggests actual losses are unlikely.
The autopsy thus doubles as a roadmap. Lanningham requires stronger fuzzing and spec-driven testing, richer node-to-client protocols so wallets and exchanges can implement circuit breakers based mostly on actual consensus well being, extra range in monitoring stacks, and higher schooling for SPOs on how Ouroboros behaves underneath stress. Hoskinson, for his half, floated the thought of an AI “improve sentinel” for operators and revived calls for for a built-in pub/sub channel for emergency alerts.
For the broader narrative conflict, Lanningham’s place is intentionally dispassionate: “If, after that, you resolve for your self that Cardano ‘went down’, I received’t begrudge you your opinion. I’m not valuable about that label… What issues is affect.” Hoskinson is much less diplomatic, dismissing most social-media commentary as noise. What he desires the trade to remove is easier: on November 24, 2025, after Poison Piggy, Cardano is again to at least one chain – and its subsequent iteration of hardening has already begun.
At press time, ADA traded at $0.4141.
Featured picture created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Editorial Course of for bitcoinist is centered on delivering completely researched, correct, and unbiased content material. We uphold strict sourcing requirements, and every web page undergoes diligent assessment by our workforce of high expertise specialists and seasoned editors. This course of ensures the integrity, relevance, and worth of our content material for our readers.
