Former Binance CEO, Changpeng Zhao (CZ), lately acknowledged that the UAE generates surplus energy as a way to cowl “three days” of excessive demand every year, making Bitcoin a purchaser of final resort for power that will in any other case go unused.
Stripping away the specifics, the logic holds: mining turns curtailed or stranded electrical energy into income when no different offtaker needs it.
The query for 2026 is not whether or not surplus could be mined, however whether or not that surplus is structural sufficient to contract, and whether or not miners can maintain their place as AI and high-performance computing push up the clearing worth for agency provide.
The economics are easy. Electrical energy accounts for greater than 80% of miners’ money working bills, in line with Cambridge’s Digital Mining Trade Report.
The identical report cites a median electricity-only price of round $45 per megawatt-hour and notes that surveyed miners curtailed 888 gigawatt-hours of load in 2023, roughly 101 megawatts of common withheld capability.
That curtailment determine helps the flexible-load thesis: miners can change off when grids want reduction or when costs spike, making them helpful to utilities managing intermittency or congestion.
Geography tells the remainder of the story. Whereas imperfect in methodology, the Cambridge Bitcoin Electrical energy Consumption Index Mining Map tracks the place hashrate concentrates, although the info carries caveats, comparable to estimates lagging by one to a few months, and VPN or proxy routing can inflate shares in nations like Germany and Eire.
Nation attribution depends on geolocating IP addresses, a technique that’s delicate to routing habits and topic to different inference limitations.
Inside these constraints, the map exhibits mining distributed throughout jurisdictions with one factor in frequent: entry to energy that is both low cost, stranded, or each.
Pakistan turns overcapacity into coverage
Pakistan made essentially the most specific guess. The federal government introduced plans to allocate 2,000 megawatts within the first section of a nationwide initiative cut up between Bitcoin mining and AI information facilities, with CZ named strategic adviser to the Pakistan Crypto Council.
The Finance Ministry framed it as a method to monetize surplus technology in areas with extra power, turning underutilized capability right into a tradable asset.
Two thousand megawatts operating constantly would generate 17.52 terawatt-hours yearly. With fashionable mining fleets working at 15 to 25 joules per terahash, that energy may theoretically help 80 to 133 exahashes per second of hashrate earlier than accounting for curtailment, energy utilization effectiveness, or downtime.
The size issues lower than the construction.
What sort of contracts will miners signal, interruptible or agency baseload? Which areas get chosen, and the way sturdy is the coverage if tariffs rise or IMF stress intensifies?
Pakistan’s initiative indicators that “further electrons” can develop into a nationwide export, however execution will decide whether or not 2,000 megawatts materializes as a hub or only a headline.
Surplus by design, not accident
The UAE’s alternative is not perpetual surplus, however it’s surplus-by-design.
Peak demand in Dubai reached 10.76 gigawatts in 2024, up 3.4% year-over-year, concentrated in summer time months when cooling dominates load.
The Worldwide Power Company (IEA) initiatives that cooling and desalination will account for near 40% of electrical energy demand development within the Center East and North Africa by means of 2035, with information facilities explicitly named as one other rising load supply.
That creates a particular opening for miners: utilities construct techniques to deal with excessive summer time peaks however want year-round monetization, normalization, and grid stability throughout off-peak intervals.
Miners win the place they will supply extra flexibility than AI or HPC consumers, comparable to curtailment-ready hundreds that soak up energy others cannot take due to location, congestion, or dispatch constraints.
Bitcoin miners can change off straight away, whereas datacenters require steady operation, making curtailment and grid administration rather more tough.
The area’s buildout tendencies favor baseload capability that outpaces seasonal demand, however the identical IEA outlook that flags information facilities as a driver of demand means miners face direct competitors for the electrons they want.
The hub case relies on whether or not utilities worth dispatchable load sufficient to cost it attractively, or whether or not agency offtake contracts with AI consumers crowd out mining altogether.
When surplus turns into contested
Paraguay illustrates what occurs when surplus energy attracts miners, solely to set off a backlash.
The nation’s hydro capability attracted operators looking for low cost electrical energy, however tariff adjustments repriced that benefit. Miners now reportedly pay between $44.34 and $59.76 per megawatt-hour plus taxes, and native trade sources cited 35 firms ceasing operations after the rise.
Legislation No. 7300 tightened penalties for electrical energy theft linked to unauthorized crypto mining, elevating most sentences to 10 years and permitting the confiscation of kit.
However, actual capital nonetheless flows in. HIVE accomplished Part 1 infrastructure at a 100 megawatt facility backed by a totally energized 200 megawatt substation, signaling that some operators see sturdy economics even after repricing.
The strain is obvious: hydro surplus creates the preliminary draw, however as soon as miners scale, the state re-prices energy when it realizes they seem to be a concentrated, taxable offtaker, or native grid constraints and noise externalities construct political stress.
Paraguay’s trajectory exhibits how a hub can flip if social license breaks, making coverage sturdiness a first-order variable in any site-selection mannequin.
What truly makes a hub
Mining hub viability in 2026 comes all the way down to a components: delivered price per megawatt-hour instances contract flexibility instances coverage sturdiness, measured towards what AI and HPC consumers are prepared to pay, grid shortage, and foreign-exchange or import friction.
Three situations play out throughout these variables.
Within the first, curtailment gluts persist: renewables add quicker than grids can soak up, curtailment rises, and miners win as versatile offtake. Hydro- or seasonal-surplus jurisdictions with weak transmission, comparable to Paraguay, or nations explicitly monetizing overcapacity, comparable to Pakistan, are the likeliest hubs.
Within the second, AI outbids miners for agency energy. Information facilities search long-term agency provide, pushing miners into interruptible, congestion-prone, or stranded pockets. Hubs emerge the place miners can entry interruptible pricing or “can’t-export” power fairly than prime agency capability.
Within the third, political repricing or backlash reshapes the panorama. Governments elevate tariffs as soon as miners scale or when households see shortages or noise. Paraguay turns into the template: a hub flips when the economics that attracted miners get recalibrated by the identical state that constructed them.
The IEA’s framing issues right here. World electrical energy demand is forecast to develop at a roughly 4% annual price by means of 2027, pushed by industrial output, air con, electrification, and information facilities.
Renewable capability additions are accelerating, however grid integration lags. That lag creates the curtailment and congestion that miners can monetize, however it additionally means surplus is a transferring goal.
The hubs that survive 2026 aren’t simply cheap-power jurisdictions, but in addition locations the place curtailment or congestion is prone to persist, regulation tolerates mining as dispatchable load, and miners can compete with or complement AI and HPC for electrons.
The guidelines
Six variables decide whether or not a jurisdiction turns into a mining hub or only a headline.
Surplus sort is the primary. Is it hydro seasonality, stranded fuel, flare mitigation, or nuclear baseload off-peak? Every has totally different persistence and contractability.
The delivered price and contract construction observe because the second variable. What is the all-in worth per megawatt-hour, and is the contract interruptible? Who bears congestion danger, and is there compensation for curtailment?
Then comes the ASIC import and logistics, comparable to customs duties, transport lanes, spare components availability, and capital controls, all of which have an effect on speed-to-market and operational danger.
Coverage sturdiness is the fourth variable: tariff repricing danger, licensing necessities, sudden bans, and theft enforcement decide whether or not a hub stays a hub.
Local weather, cooling, and water additionally play an element. Air-cooling limits, immersion feasibility, and warmth or noise externalities constrain the place large-scale operations can function with out triggering native opposition.
The final variable is offtake competitors: AI and HPC demand development is now explicitly mirrored in electrical energy demand forecasts. Hubs should assume competitors for “good electrons,” not simply low cost ones.
Pakistan’s 2,000 megawatt plan is the clearest sign that governments see surplus electrical energy as an exportable asset class, with mining as one monetization path.
Jurisdiction1) Surplus / curtailment type2) Delivered $/MWh + contract structure3) ASIC import/logistics + FX4) Coverage durability5) Local weather/cooling + water6) Offtake competitors (AI/HPC)Pakistan⚠️ Overcapacity framed as coverage (“areas with extra power”), however persistence/seasonality not but confirmed⚠️ Value & phrases TBD (headline MW ≠ delivered $/MWh; key’s interruptible vs agency + curtailment comp)❌ FX/import friction possible (capital controls, transport/customs uncertainty)⚠️/❌ Execution danger (tariff politics + IMF scrutiny may pressure repricing or sluggish rollout)⚠️/❌ Scorching local weather → larger cooling load/PUE until sited in cooler areas❌ Direct competitors (initiative explicitly contains AI information facilities; agency energy might get bid up)UAE (Dubai/GCC lens)⚠️ “Surplus-by-design” (techniques constructed for summer time peaks → off-peak monetization potential)❌/⚠️ Printed tariffs are excessive; mining wants particular contracts/curtailment-ready pricing to work✅ Greatest-in-class logistics (ports, spares, finance; low friction scaling)✅ Usually secure allowing setting (however power pricing is the swing variable)❌ Excessive warmth makes cooling a first-order constraint; water/warmth externalities matter❌ Excessive competitors (information facilities increasing; miners possible pushed to interruptible/constrained pockets)Paraguay✅ Hydro surplus draw (Itaipú-style abundance is the core “hub” attractor)⚠️ Nonetheless aggressive however repriced (tariff hikes + taxes; economics depend upon contract specifics)⚠️ Landlocked/logistics add time/price; manageable however not “plug-and-play”❌ Sturdiness danger (tariff repricing + enforcement stress = hub can “flip”)✅ Extra forgiving local weather than GCC; simpler cooling profile✅ Decrease AI/HPC bidding stress vs main metro markets (for now)
Whether or not that path results in 2026’s subsequent main hubs relies on execution, together with contract phrases, web site choice, and whether or not the political consensus holds as miners begin consuming gigawatt-hours at scale.
CZ’s thesis about Bitcoin as a purchaser of final resort is right in precept. The apply is messier, contingent on grids that may’t soak up renewables quick sufficient, states that tolerate versatile hundreds, and miners who can keep aggressive as information facilities bid up the value of agency energy.
The hubs that emerge would be the ones the place these circumstances align lengthy sufficient to construct infrastructure and signal contracts that survive the primary tariff revision or the primary summer time blackout.
