Prediction markets entered the mainstream in 2025, with a fourfold surge in annual buying and selling quantity as a handful of venues consolidated management over what’s quickly changing into an institutional-scale product, in accordance with a brand new report from blockchain safety agency CertiK.
The sector’s whole quantity rose from $15.8 billion in 2024 to $63.5 billion in 2025, the report mentioned, with exercise remaining elevated after the US election cycle and lengthening into January 2026.
That persistence issues as a result of it means that election buying and selling behaved much less like a one-off spike and extra like an acquisition occasion that drew new customers into repeat habits.
Notably, the week ending Jan. 18 set a report of about $6 billion in notional quantity, the report mentioned, reflecting how shortly prediction markets have moved from area of interest crypto product to a high-turnover buying and selling venue.
Nonetheless, CertiK’s central argument is that the subsequent section of progress is colliding with an integrity drawback that has much less to do with sensible contract exploits than with the layers that govern onboarding, the “actual” which means of quantity, and the mechanisms that decide who will get paid.
A 3-platform market with single-point failures
Three platforms now account for greater than 95% of worldwide prediction market quantity, in accordance with CertiK, and every is pursuing a distinct path to dominance.
Kalshi, which operates as a regulated venue within the US, is positioned because the compliance-first mannequin. Polymarket has captured the biggest share of crypto-native and worldwide participation.
In the meantime, Opinion is the fast-growing entrant, utilizing ecosystem incentives to scale from successfully zero to roughly 30% market share in months, the report mentioned.
That focus turns operational points into systemic ones.
A failure at any main venue is now not a contained occasion; it’s a market-wide belief shock that may unfold throughout liquidity swimming pools, information feeds, and person balances, notably as brokers and mainstream distribution start to deal with prediction chances like a brand new class of data product.
CertiK factors to a December 2025 incident involving Magic.hyperlink, Polymarket’s third-party authentication supplier, as a preview of the place the sector is most uncovered.
Accounts utilizing Web2-style login strategies, resembling e-mail or social authentication, had been compromised, putting funds in affected accounts in danger, whereas the on-chain settlement layer remained safe.
In CertiK’s framing, it was an identification failure, not a settlement failure, and it highlighted the tradeoff of “Web2.5” onboarding: a smoother person expertise in alternate for centralized failure factors.
The lesson is uncomfortable for an business that markets itself on decentralization.
Prediction markets can help absolutely collateralized on-chain settlement whereas retaining the identical third-party dangers that plague typical fintech, together with authentication, account restoration, and platform-level entry controls.
When the tape lies however the odds nonetheless discuss
The report additionally attracts a line between two ideas which might be typically conflated in crypto markets: buying and selling quantity as a proxy for adoption and likelihood outputs as a proxy for data.
In keeping with the report, incentive packages can inflate exercise with out essentially enhancing the standard of forecasting alerts.
CertiK reported that wash buying and selling stays widespread, citing analysis estimating that synthetic quantity reached as excessive as 60% on some platforms throughout peak airdrop-farming intervals.
Such distortion can mislead outsiders, together with potential institutional customers, concerning liquidity depth and natural participation.
But CertiK argues the extra vital query is whether or not the chances stay helpful even when the tape is noisy.
Within the report’s view, wash buying and selling has inflated quantity metrics however has not but compromised worth accuracy, and likelihood outputs have remained dependable for forecasting.
This creates rigidity for platforms searching for to graduate to mainstream finance; they are able to place themselves as data utilities even when their exercise metrics are partly fabricated by incentives.
It additionally raises a tougher strategic resolution for the market leaders.
If distribution and credibility depend upon data high quality, platforms might should change into much less tolerant of behaviors that increase quantity within the brief time period however undermine the optics and belief required for institutional capital.
Chain migration and the brand new execution plumbing
Beneath the headline numbers, CertiK describes a structural rotation in how prediction market liquidity is executed.
Polygon retained “legacy dominance” by means of the November election cycle, the report mentioned, however BNB Chain quantity surged starting in late 2025, correlating with Opinion’s accelerated incentive rollout.
By the week of Jan. 19, CertiK mentioned BNB Chain exercise had successfully flipped the historic hierarchy, capturing the plurality of weekly flows and pushing off-chain settlement right into a secondary place, at the same time as Kalshi posted report efficiency throughout NFL playoff buying and selling.
That shift is greater than a scoreboard for blockchain ecosystems. It modifications who can take part, how trades are cleared, and which market buildings are possible.
CertiK notes that many on-chain venues are shifting from automated market makers to central restrict order books deployed instantly on high-throughput chains, a design that produces tighter spreads and extra acquainted mechanics for skilled merchants.
In follow, it additionally strikes prediction markets nearer to an exchange-like microstructure, with the attendant dangers of front-running and the MEV-style transaction-ordering disadvantages on public networks.
The oracle drawback, the second the place “reality” turns into a payout
If there’s a single tail danger that unifies the sector’s progress story, it’s decision, the step that converts chances into money.
CertiK characterizes oracle manipulation as the first technical assault vector as a result of market-resolution mechanisms instantly management fund distribution.
It additionally says ambiguous market definitions have already induced disputes throughout all main platforms all through 2025, particularly the place political outcomes or contested official outcomes create grey areas.
The report maps the principle decision fashions throughout the dominant platforms.
Polymarket is described as utilizing UMA’s optimistic oracle, through which outcomes resolve routinely until disputed inside a problem window, with disputes escalating to UMA token-holder votes.
Kalshi is framed as utilizing centralized arbitration, with human arbiters resolving outcomes primarily based on authoritative sources.
Opinion is described as counting on consensus oracles, the place designated events should agree on an final result.
Every mannequin carries a distinct belief assumption. Optimistic oracles could be quick for unambiguous outcomes however create edge-case vulnerability, together with the danger that giant token holders might affect votes in low-liquidity disputes.
Centralized arbitration is predictable however requires trusting the platform operator. Consensus oracles distribute authority however nonetheless depend upon the incentives and integrity of the designated resolvers.
As prediction markets scale, these tradeoffs change into tougher to disregard.
The sector can tolerate occasional edge-case controversy when it’s a crypto curiosity. Nonetheless, turns into a governance disaster when market chances start to look in mainstream distribution channels or are utilized by establishments as inputs to danger selections.
